United States v. McNab

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. McNab

331 F.3d 1228, 2003 WL 21233535

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedMay 29, 2003

DocketNos. 01-15148, 02-10810 and 02-11264

StatusPublished

Cited by20 cases

This text of 331 F.3d 1228 (United States v. McNab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. McNab, 331 F.3d 1228, 2003 WL 21233535 (11th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDERED:

The petitions for rehearing are granted in part by deleting entirely footnote 24 from the Court’s opinion which was issued on March 21, 2003. The Court will issue a substituted opinion making that deletion. The Court otherwise denies the petitions for rehearing of defendants’ McNab, Schoenwetter, Huang, Blandford and Embassy of Honduras.

No member of this Court having requested a poll, we deny the suggestion for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 35(a); Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5.

FAY, Circuit Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDERED:

The petitions for rehearing are granted in part by deleting entirely footnote 24 from the Court’s opinion which was issued on March 21, 2003. The Court will issue a substituted opinion making that deletion. The Court otherwise denies the petitions for rehearing of defendants’ McNab, Schoenwetter, Huang, Blandford and Embassy of Honduras.

No member of this Court having requested a poll, we deny the suggestion for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 35(a); Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5.

FAY, Circuit Judge, dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

331 F.3d 1228, 2003 WL 21233535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcnab-ca11-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack