United States v. McLean
Opinion
Thomas George McLean appeals the district court’s order denying as untimely his motion to dismiss indictment, Fed. R.Crim.P. (12)(b)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. McLean, No. CR-00-160 (E.D.Va. Sept. 1, 2004). We grant McLean’s motion to proceed in forma pauper-is and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
120 F. App'x 988 (United States v. McLean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.