United States v. McLean

120 F. App'x 988
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. McLean. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 F. App'x 34
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 7, 2005·No. 04-7756·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Thomas George McLean appeals the district court’s order denying as untimely his motion to dismiss indictment, Fed. R.Crim.P. (12)(b)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. McLean, No. CR-00-160 (E.D.Va. Sept. 1, 2004). We grant McLean’s motion to proceed in forma pauper-is and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McLean, 120 F. App'x 988 (4th Cir. 2005).

120 F. App'x 988 (United States v. McLean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.