United States v. McKubbin

Fourth Circuit

United States v. McKubbin

479 F. App'x 494

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 2, 2012·No. No. 12-6926·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jackie McKubbin appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McKubbin, No. 3:95-cr-00005-FDW-3 (W.D.N.C. May 8, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jackie McKubbin appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McKubbin, No. 3:95-cr-00005-FDW-3 (W.D.N.C. May 8, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. McKubbin, 479 F. App'x 494 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

479 F. App'x 494 (United States v. McKubbin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related