United States v. McKenstry
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Cory McKenstry appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have re[166] viewed the record and find no reversible error. Because McKenstry’s Sentencing Guidelines range was not based on drug quantity, Amendment 782 does not lower the applicable Guidelines range. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. McKenstry, No. 1:05-cr-00281-JFM-1 (D. Md. Feb. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court, and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
655 F. App'x 165 (United States v. McKenstry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.