United States v. McKelvey
This text of United States v. McKelvey (United States v. McKelvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7298
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
STEVEN MCKELVEY, a/k/a Custard, C,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (6:00-cr-00380-GRA-1)
Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: January 13, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven McKelvey, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Steven McKelvey appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. McKelvey, No. 6:00-cr-
00380-GRA-1 (D.S.C. July 15, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. McKelvey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mckelvey-ca4-2009.