United States v. McKay
667 F. App'x 583
This text of 667 F. App'x 583 (United States v. McKay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. McKay, 667 F. App'x 583 (8th Cir. 2016).
Opinion
Rashad McKay appeals after the district court1 denied him a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Following careful de novo review, see United States v. Long, 757 F.3d 762, 763 (8th Cir. 2014), we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Roland Long
757 F.3d 762 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
667 F. App'x 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mckay-ca8-2016.