United States v. McGaha
This text of United States v. McGaha (United States v. McGaha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6315
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
KENNETH DEWAYNE MCGAHA,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (8:06-cr-01187-HFF-1)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: June 1, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Dewayne McGaha, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Dewayne McGaha appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McGaha,
No. 8:06-cr-01187-HFF-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. McGaha, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcgaha-ca4-2009.