United States v. McGaha

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 1, 2009
Docket09-6315
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. McGaha (United States v. McGaha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. McGaha, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6315

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

KENNETH DEWAYNE MCGAHA,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (8:06-cr-01187-HFF-1)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: June 1, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Dewayne McGaha, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Dewayne McGaha appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McGaha,

No. 8:06-cr-01187-HFF-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. McGaha, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcgaha-ca4-2009.