United States v. McFadden

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. McFadden. Read the opinion of the Court — 187 F. App'x 290
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 17, 2008·No. 08-6780·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6780

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

VASSEL MCFADDEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:01-cr-00176-RBS-1)

Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 17, 2008

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vassel McFadden, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Vassel McFadden appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000 & Supp. 2008) motion for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. McFadden, No.

2:01-cr-00176-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 9, 2008 & entered Apr. 15,

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McFadden, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. McFadden (United States v. McFadden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related