United States v. McDonald
This text of United States v. McDonald (United States v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20899 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TRAVIS PAUL McDONALD,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-389-22 --------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel for Travis Paul McDonald has filed a motion to
withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738, 744 (1967). McDonald has received a copy of the motion and
brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of
the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this
direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. McDonald, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcdonald-ca5-2005.