United States v. McDonald

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. McDonald. Read the opinion of the Court — 108 F. App'x 916
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2004·No. 03-30436·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-30436 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

ERIC MCDONALD, also known as E,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 02-CR-302-6-B --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel for Eric McDonald has filed a motion to withdraw and

an accompanying brief as required by Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). McDonald has received a copy of counsel’s

motion and brief and has filed a response. Our independent

review of the brief, McDonald’s response, and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McDonald, (5th Cir. 2004).

United States v. McDonald (United States v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)