United States v. McDonald
Opinion
[827]*827Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Timothy Gerrell McDonald appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McDonald, No. 7:03-cr-00029-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
353 F. App'x 826 (United States v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.