United States v. McDonald

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. McDonald. Read the opinion of the Court — 64 F. App'x 359
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2005·No. 04-7796·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7796

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DONOVAN J. MCDONALD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-97-13)

Submitted: April 22, 2005 Decided: June 24, 2005

Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donovan J. McDonald, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Donovan J. McDonald appeals from the district court’s

order denying and dismissing his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. §

3582 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McDonald, (4th Cir. 2005).

United States v. McDonald (United States v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related