United States v. McDaniel

318 F. App'x 194
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. McDaniel. Read the opinion of the Court — 290 F. App'x 562
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 18, 2009·No. No. 09-6031·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Trini McDaniel appeals a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). The district court found McDaniel was not eligible for a reduction because he was responsible for more than 4.5 kilograms of crack cocaine. We affirm.

We find the district did not abuse its discretion denying McDaniel’s motion for a sentence reduction. United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral, argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McDaniel, 318 F. App'x 194 (4th Cir. 2009).

318 F. App'x 194 (United States v. McDaniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Anthony Goines
357 F.3d 469 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)