United States v. McCullers

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. McCullers. Read the opinion of the Court — 395 F. App'x 975
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2011·No. 10-7305·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7305

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TIMOTHY GEROME MCCULLERS, a/k/a Tim,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:94-cr-00097-F-6)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 20, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Gerome McCullers, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Timothy Gerome McCullers appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. McCullers, No. 5:94-cr-00097-F-6 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 1,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McCullers, (4th Cir. 2011).

United States v. McCullers (United States v. McCullers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related