United States v. McCrorey

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 8, 2009·No. 09-6067·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6067

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DOROTHY MCCROREY, a/k/a Big Dot,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:06-cr-00061-JFA-12)

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 8, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dorothy McCrorey, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dorothy McCrorey appeals the district court’s order

denying her motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

McCrorey, No. 3:06-cr-00061-JFA-12 (D.S.C. Dec. 18, 2008). We

deny McCrorey’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McCrorey, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. McCrorey (United States v. McCrorey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related