United States v. McCrorey
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6067
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DOROTHY MCCROREY, a/k/a Big Dot,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:06-cr-00061-JFA-12)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 8, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dorothy McCrorey, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Dorothy McCrorey appeals the district court’s order
denying her motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
McCrorey, No. 3:06-cr-00061-JFA-12 (D.S.C. Dec. 18, 2008). We
deny McCrorey’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. McCrorey (United States v. McCrorey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.