United States v. McClaren

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 23, 2007·No. 06-7915·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7915

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WENLEY MCCLAREN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (3:90-cr-00007-WCB)

Submitted: April 19, 2007 Decided: April 23, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wenley McClaren, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wenley McClaren appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for correction of an illegal sentence pursuant

to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we grant McClaren’s motion to

proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. McClaren, No. 3:90-cr-00007-WCB

(N.D.W. Va. Oct. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McClaren, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. McClaren (United States v. McClaren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.