United States v. McClaren
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7915
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WENLEY MCCLAREN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (3:90-cr-00007-WCB)
Submitted: April 19, 2007 Decided: April 23, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wenley McClaren, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Wenley McClaren appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for correction of an illegal sentence pursuant
to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we grant McClaren’s motion to
proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. McClaren, No. 3:90-cr-00007-WCB
(N.D.W. Va. Oct. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. McClaren (United States v. McClaren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.