United States v. McClaren

Fourth Circuit

United States v. McClaren

224 F. App'x 258

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 23, 2007·No. No. 06-7915·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Wenley McClaren appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for correction of an illegal sentence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant McClaren’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McClaren, No. 3:90-cr-00007-WCB (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Wenley McClaren appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for correction of an illegal sentence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant McClaren’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McClaren, No. 3:90-cr-00007-WCB (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. McClaren, 224 F. App'x 258 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

224 F. App'x 258 (United States v. McClaren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.