United States v. McClam

671 F. App'x 216
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 20, 2016·No. No. 16-7129·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wardell Jermaine McClam, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McClam, No. 1:08-cr-00230-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2016). We deny McClam’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral' argument be[217] cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McClam, 671 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2016).

671 F. App'x 216 (United States v. McClam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related