United States v. McClam
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Wardell Jermaine McClam, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McClam, No. 1:08-cr-00230-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2016). We deny McClam’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral' argument be[217] cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
671 F. App'x 216 (United States v. McClam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.