United States v. McClam
This text of 671 F. App'x 216 (United States v. McClam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Wardell Jermaine McClam, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McClam, No. 1:08-cr-00230-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2016). We deny McClam’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral' argument be[217]*217cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
671 F. App'x 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcclam-ca4-2016.