United States v. McCann

8 C.M.A. 675, 8 USCMA 675, 25 C.M.R. 179, 1958 CMA LEXIS 689, 1958 WL 3109
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedFebruary 14, 1958
DocketNo. 9454
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 8 C.M.A. 675 (United States v. McCann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. McCann, 8 C.M.A. 675, 8 USCMA 675, 25 C.M.R. 179, 1958 CMA LEXIS 689, 1958 WL 3109 (cma 1958).

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

A number of claims of error are alleged. Only one need be mentioned.

The accused was charged with being drunk on duty, in violation of Article 112, and with the operation of a Ground Control Approach facility while drunk and in such a reckless manner as to endanger life and property, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 912 and 934, respectively. The trial began on April 5, 1956, and continued until April 11, 1956. On April 9, several members of the court-martial attended a lecture on military justice given by the staff judge advocate. In his talk, the staff judge advocate discussed certain acts of misconduct which he characterized as being more reprehensible in the military than in the civilian community. One of the acts cited was that of a Ground Control Approach operator incapacitating himself for duty by the use of intoxicants.

The “justice” lecture clearly constituted an improper influence upon the court members in regard to a case upon which they were then sitting. Under the circumstances, reversal of the accused's conviction is required. United States v Zagar, 5 USCMA 410, 18 CMR 34; see also United States v Harris, 8 USCMA 199, 24 CMR 9; United States v Deain, 5 USCMA 44, 17 CMR 44.

The findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside. A rehearing may be ordered.

Judge Ferguson concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Baldwin
54 M.J. 308 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2001)
United States v. Biagase
50 M.J. 143 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1999)
United States v. Reynolds
40 M.J. 198 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1994)
United States v. Jones
33 M.J. 1040 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1991)
United States v. Brice
19 M.J. 170 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1985)
United States v. Danzine
12 C.M.A. 350 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1961)
United States v. Olson
11 C.M.A. 286 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1960)
United States v. Nowling
9 C.M.A. 100 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
United States v. Carter
9 C.M.A. 108 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
United States v. Musguire
9 C.M.A. 67 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 C.M.A. 675, 8 USCMA 675, 25 C.M.R. 179, 1958 CMA LEXIS 689, 1958 WL 3109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mccann-cma-1958.