United States v. Mays

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Mays. Read the opinion of the Court — 276 F. App'x 311
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2008·No. 08-6737·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6737

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TERESA MAYS, a/k/a Toreatha A. Beaty,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (0:97-cr-00105-CMC-1)

Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 27, 2008

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Teresa Mays, Appellant Pro Se. James Chris Leventis, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Teresa Mays appeals the district court’s order denying

her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for sentence reduction.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Mays, No. 0:97-cr-00105-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Apr.

24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mays, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Mays (United States v. Mays) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related