United States v. Mays
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6737
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TERESA MAYS, a/k/a Toreatha A. Beaty,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (0:97-cr-00105-CMC-1)
Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 27, 2008
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Teresa Mays, Appellant Pro Se. James Chris Leventis, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Teresa Mays appeals the district court’s order denying
her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for sentence reduction.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Mays, No. 0:97-cr-00105-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Apr.
24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Mays (United States v. Mays) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.