United States v. Mayo

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8221

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

BREON LEE MAYO,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:06-cr-00116-JBF-FBS-1

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 29, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Breon Lee Mayo, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Breon Lee Mayo appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and agree with

the district court’s conclusion that Mayo was not eligible for a

sentence reduction because he was found responsible for more

than 4.5 kilograms of crack cocaine. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s order. United States v. Mayo, No. 2:06-cr-

00116-JBF-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 1, 2009 & entered

Dec. 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED