United States v. Mayes

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 6, 2009·No. 09-6709·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6709

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NELSON ANTHONY MAYES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:04-cr-00320)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 6, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nelson Anthony Mayes, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Olivia N. Hawkins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Nelson Anthony Mayes appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Mayes, No. 3:04-cr-00320 (E.D. Va. Dec. 8, 2008). We

deny Mayes’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mayes, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Mayes (United States v. Mayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related