United States v. Maxwell

378 F. App'x 327
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2010·No. 08-8044A·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Faiza Maxwell appeals the district court’s memorandum decision and order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Maxwell, No. 3:02-cr-00152-FDW-11 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because *328 the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Maxwell, 378 F. App'x 327 (4th Cir. 2010).

378 F. App'x 327 (United States v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maxwell v. United States
178 L. Ed. 2d 238 (Supreme Court, 2010)