United States v. Matthew Eaton

407 F. App'x 250
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 5, 2011·No. 10-50162·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Matthew Allen Eaton appeals from the 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to transport stolen property in interstate and foreign commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2314. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Eaton contends that the district court erred by imposing a two-level upward adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.4 for using a minor to commit a crime. The record reflects that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Eaton affirmatively used his children in the conspiracy. See United States v. Castro-Hernandez, 258 F.3d 1057, 1060-61 (9th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Matthew Eaton, 407 F. App'x 250 (9th Cir. 2011).

407 F. App'x 250 (United States v. Matthew Eaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Alberto Castro-Hernandez
258 F.3d 1057 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)