United States v. Matthew Eaton

407 F. App'x 250
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 5, 2011
Docket10-50162
StatusUnpublished

This text of 407 F. App'x 250 (United States v. Matthew Eaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Matthew Eaton, 407 F. App'x 250 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Matthew Allen Eaton appeals from the 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to transport stolen property in interstate and foreign commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2314. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Eaton contends that the district court erred by imposing a two-level upward adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.4 for using a minor to commit a crime. The record reflects that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Eaton affirmatively used his children in the conspiracy. See United States v. Castro-Hernandez, 258 F.3d 1057, 1060-61 (9th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Alberto Castro-Hernandez
258 F.3d 1057 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
407 F. App'x 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-matthew-eaton-ca9-2011.