United States v. Massey
This text of United States v. Massey (United States v. Massey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6616
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHELLE HARDIN MASSEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:00-cr-00210-GCM-CH-3)
Submitted: May 19, 2009 Decided: July 8, 2009
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michelle Hardin Massey, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Michelle Hardin Massey appeals the district court’s
order denying her motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Massey, No. 3:00-cr-
00210-GCM-CH-3 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Massey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-massey-ca4-2009.