United States v. Mason

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Mason. Read the opinion of the Court — 628 F.3d 123
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 6, 2009·No. 09-6506·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6506

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GREGORY MASON, a/k/a G,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (2:92-cr-00163-4)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 6, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Mason, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gregory Mason appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Mason, No. 2:92-cr-

00163-4 (E.D. Va. Dec. 15, 2009). We deny Mason’s motion for

appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mason, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Mason (United States v. Mason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related