United States v. Martinez-Patricio

64 F. App'x 406
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 3, 2003·No. No. 02-7652·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pedro Martinez-Patricio seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Martinez-Patricio has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Martinez-Patricio, 64 F. App'x 406 (4th Cir. 2003).

64 F. App'x 406 (United States v. Martinez-Patricio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)