United States v. Martinez-Martinez

202 F. App'x 26
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Martinez-Martinez. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 F. App'x 644
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 5, 2006·No. 06-40410·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Liborio Martinez-Martinez raises *27 arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *27 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Martinez-Martinez, 202 F. App'x 26 (5th Cir. 2006).

202 F. App'x 26 (United States v. Martinez-Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Almendarez-Torres v. United States
523 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 1998)