United States v. Martinez-Martinez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Martinez-Martinez. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 F. App'x 644
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 12, 2002·No. 01-40324·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40324 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUNIOR STANDLY MARTINEZ-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-447-1 -------------------- June 11, 2002

Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Junior

Standly Martinez-Martinez (Martinez) on appeal has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Martinez has not filed a

response. Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous appellate issue. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-40324 -2-

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Martinez-Martinez, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Martinez-Martinez (United States v. Martinez-Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)