United States v. Martinez-Martinez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 12, 2000·No. 99-41080·Unpublished

Opinion

No. -1-

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-41080 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

MARCELINO MARTINEZ-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-99-CR-118-ALL -------------------- April 12, 2000

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marcelino

Martinez-Martinez has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a

brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Martinez-Martinez received a copy of counsel’s motion

and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review

of the brief and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities in this case, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Martinez-Martinez, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Martinez-Martinez (United States v. Martinez-Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)