United States v. Martin
84 F. App'x 804
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Felix Claude Martin appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Because we cannot review the district court’s discretionary decision not to modify Martin’s sentence pursuant to § 3582(c)(2), we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v. Lowe, 136 F.3d 1231, 1233 (9th Cir.1998).
DISMISSED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Martin, 84 F. App'x 804 (9th Cir. 2003).
84 F. App'x 804 (United States v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas James LOWE, AKA Thomas Edward Blake, Defendant-Appellant
136 F.3d 1231 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)