United States v. Martin

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Martin

616 F. App'x 65

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 14, 2015·No. No. 15-6929·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clinton Shawn Martin, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 782. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Martin, No. 5:09-er-00043-SGW-1 (E.D.Va. filed May 28, 2015, entered May 29, 2015). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clinton Shawn Martin, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 782. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Martin, No. 5:09-er-00043-SGW-1 (E.D.Va. filed May 28, 2015, entered May 29, 2015). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Martin, 616 F. App'x 65 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

616 F. App'x 65 (United States v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related