United States v. Martin

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 14, 1998·No. 98-6403·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6403

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KEVIN MARTIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-95, CA-97-230-3)

Submitted: July 31, 1998 Decided: August 14, 1998

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Farrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia; Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Kevin Martin seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-

ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Martin, Nos. CR-93-95; CA-97-230-3

(S.D.W. Va. Feb. 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Martin, (4th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Martin (United States v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related