United States v. Martin
This text of United States v. Martin (United States v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7288
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JIMMY WAYNE MARTIN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-91-239; CA-94-582-2)
Submitted: January 23, 1996 Decided: May 20, 1996
Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, WIDENER, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmy Wayne Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and find no reversible error. We affirm
substantially on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Martin, Nos. CR-91-239; CA-94-582-2 (M.D.N.C. July 31, 1995).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Martin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martin-ca4-1996.