United States v. Marshall

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7260

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JULIUS JOSEPHUS MARSHALL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:03-cr-00076-JBF-TEM-1)

Submitted: November 17, 2008 Decided: December 18, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julius Josephus Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Julius Josephus Marshall appeals the district court’s

order granting in part his motion for reduction of sentence

under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Marshall, No. 2:03-cr-00076-JBF-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 3,

2008 & entered July 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED