United States v. Marrow

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 19, 2008
• Docket: 08-6551
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6551

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

KASHAWN DARNELL MARROW,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:07-cr-00008-JBF-TEM-1)

Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 19, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kashawn Darnell Marrow, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kashawn Darnell Marrow appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Marrow, No. 4:07-cr-00008-JBF-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. filed

Mar. 27, 2008 & entered Mar. 28, 2008). In his informal brief,

Marrow seeks to raise new Guidelines amendments, effective after

the date of the district court’s order. While we express no

opinion on the applicability of the amendments to Marrow’s

sentence, our decision is without prejudice to Marrow filing

another motion regarding the new amendments. We deny Marrow’s

motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED