United States v. Mario Baker

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Mario Baker. Read the opinion of the Court — 719 F.3d 313
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2015·No. 15-6845·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6845

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARIO N. BAKER, a/k/a Mario Nathaniel Baker,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cr-00088-REP-RCY-1)

Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 25, 2015

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario N. Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mario N. Baker appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion seeking a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order. United States v. Baker, No. 3:08-cr-00088-REP-RCY-1

(E.D. Va. May 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mario Baker, (4th Cir. 2015).

United States v. Mario Baker (United States v. Mario Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related