United States v. Marek

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Marek

206 F.3d 449

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 24, 2000

DocketNos. 98-40568, 98-40955

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 F.3d 449 (United States v. Marek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Marek, 206 F.3d 449 (5th Cir. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this cause shall be consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument with No. 98-40955, United States of America vs. Dora Garcia Cisneros. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this cause shall be consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument with No. 98-40955, United States of America vs. Dora Garcia Cisneros. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 F.3d 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marek-ca5-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack