United States v. Betty Louise Marek
This text of 206 F.3d 449 (United States v. Betty Louise Marek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
206 F.3d 449 (5th Cir. 2000)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
BETTY LOUISE MAREK Defendant-Appellant
Nos. 98-40568, 98-40955.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
February 24, 2000
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion December 15, 1999, 5 Cir., 1999, 198 F.3d 532)
Before KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this cause shall be consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument with No. 98-40955, United States of America vs. Dora Garcia Cisneros. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 F.3d 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-betty-louise-marek-ca5-2000.