United States v. Betty Louise Marek

206 F.3d 449
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 2000
Docket98-40568
StatusPublished

This text of 206 F.3d 449 (United States v. Betty Louise Marek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Betty Louise Marek, 206 F.3d 449 (5th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

206 F.3d 449 (5th Cir. 2000)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
BETTY LOUISE MAREK Defendant-Appellant

Nos. 98-40568, 98-40955.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

February 24, 2000

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion December 15, 1999, 5 Cir., 1999, 198 F.3d 532)

Before KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this cause shall be consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument with No. 98-40955, United States of America vs. Dora Garcia Cisneros. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Marek
198 F.3d 532 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Marek
206 F.3d 449 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 F.3d 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-betty-louise-marek-ca5-2000.