United States v. Marcus Wadley

83 F.3d 108, 1996 WL 226785
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 2, 1996·No. 94-10573·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ON SUGGESTION FOB REHEARING EN BANC

Before DAVIS and WIENER, Circuit Judges, and VANCE *, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Treating the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor (FRAP and Local Rule 35), the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Marcus Wadley, 83 F.3d 108, 1996 WL 226785 (5th Cir. 1996).

83 F.3d 108 (United States v. Marcus Wadley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Garner
945 F. Supp. 990 (N.D. Texas, 1996)
United States v. Marcus Wadley
83 F.3d 108 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)