United States v. Marco Williams

587 F. App'x 413
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 10, 2014
Docket14-50172
StatusUnpublished

This text of 587 F. App'x 413 (United States v. Marco Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Marco Williams, 587 F. App'x 413 (9th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Defendant Marco Anthony Williams appeals the district court’s imposition of a 21-month sentence of imprisonment following his conviction of attempted entry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Reviewing de novo whether Defendant’s prior conviction warranted a 16-level increase under United States Sentencing Guidelines § 2L1.2, United States v. Gomez-Leon, 545 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir.2008), we affirm.

1. California Health and Safety Code “Section 11351 is categorically broader than the Guidelines definition of ‘drug trafficking offense’ because it criminalizes possession or purchase of certain substances that are not covered by the [Controlled Substances Act].” United States v. Leal-Vega, 680 F.3d 1160, 1167 (9th Cir.2012). But, as we held recently, section 11351 is divisible with respect to the type of controlled substance, so the modified categorical approach may be used. United States v. de la Torre-Jimenez, 771 F.3d 1163, 1167 (9th Cir.2014).

2. The district court correctly applied the modified categorical approach and concluded that Defendant’s conviction involved cocaine, a federally controlled substance. The documents at issue here are materially indistinguishable from the ones we found sufficient in Torre-Jimenez, id. at 1167-69. Defendant’s arguments concerning United States v. Vidal, 504 F.3d 1072, 1087 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc), were rejected in Torre-Jimenez, 771 F.3d at 1167-69.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Leal-Vega
680 F.3d 1160 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Gomez-Leon
545 F.3d 777 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Vidal
504 F.3d 1072 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Miguel De La Torre-Jimenez
771 F.3d 1163 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
587 F. App'x 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marco-williams-ca9-2014.