United States v. Manuel Rojas-Luviano

543 F. App'x 392
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2013·No. 12-20462·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Manuel Rojas-Luviano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 *393 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Rojas-Luviano has not filed a response and has been removed from the United States. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir. 2007).

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Manuel Rojas-Luviano, 543 F. App'x 392 (5th Cir. 2013).

543 F. App'x 392 (United States v. Manuel Rojas-Luviano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis
483 F.3d 381 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Hutchinson v. Central Intelligence Agency
393 F.3d 226 (D.C. Circuit, 2005)