United States v. Mandegari
This text of 195 F. App'x 666 (United States v. Mandegari) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Yahya Mandegari appeals his conviction on one count of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1543. Mandegari’s argument that § 1543 does not apply to foreign-issued passports is controlled by United States v. Dangdee, 616 F.2d 1118 (1980). Neither Small v. United States, 544 U.S. 385, 388-89, 125 S.Ct. 1752, 161 L.Ed.2d 651 (2005), nor Smith v. United States, 507 U.S. 197, 203-04, 113 S.Ct. 1178, 122 L.Ed.2d 548 (1993), is “clearly irreconcilable” with Dangdee. Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 900 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc) (noting standard). Here, the language, statutory context, and history of § 1543 indicates Congress’s intent that this statute should apply to foreign-issued passports, as well as those issued by this country. See Dangdee, 616 F.2d at 1119-20. Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 F. App'x 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mandegari-ca9-2006.