United States v. Mandegari

195 F. App'x 666
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2006·No. No. 05-50853·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Yahya Mandegari appeals his conviction on one count of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1543. Mandegari’s argument that § 1543 does not apply to foreign-issued passports is controlled by United States v. Dangdee, 616 F.2d 1118 (1980). Neither Small v. United States, 544 U.S. 385, 388-89, 125 S.Ct. 1752, 161 L.Ed.2d 651 (2005), nor Smith v. United States, 507 U.S. 197, 203-04, 113 S.Ct. 1178, 122 L.Ed.2d 548 (1993), is “clearly irreconcilable” with Dangdee. Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 900 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc) (noting standard). Here, the language, statutory context, and history of § 1543 indicates Congress’s intent that this statute should apply to foreign-issued passports, as well as those issued by this country. See Dangdee, 616 F.2d at 1119-20. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mandegari, 195 F. App'x 666 (9th Cir. 2006).

195 F. App'x 666 (United States v. Mandegari) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. United States
507 U.S. 197 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Small v. United States
544 U.S. 385 (Supreme Court, 2005)
United States v. Somboon Dangdee
616 F.2d 1118 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
Miller v. Gammie
335 F.3d 889 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)