United States v. Malone
This text of 353 F. App'x 400 (United States v. Malone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Demetria Nicole Williams, appointed counsel for Russell Glenn Malone in this appeal from the district court’s denial of Malone’s motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the [401]*401relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of Malone’s § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
353 F. App'x 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-malone-ca11-2009.