United States v. Maldonado-Burgos
This text of 869 F.3d 1 (United States v. Maldonado-Burgos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER OF COURT
Appellant United States of America filed a petition for rehearing en banc, and, pursuant to First Circuit Internal Operating Procedure X(C), the appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc has also been treated as a petition for rehearing before the original panel. The petition for rehearing has been denied by the panel of judges who decided the case, and the petition for rehearing en banc having been submitted to the active judges of this court and a majority of the judges not having voted that the case be heard en banc, it is ordered that the petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
869 F.3d 1, 2017 WL 2888680, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maldonado-burgos-ca1-2017.