United States v. Maldonado-Burgos

869 F.3d 1, 2017 WL 2888680, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12200
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedJuly 7, 2017
Docket15-2145O
StatusUnknown
Cited by35 cases

This text of 869 F.3d 1 (United States v. Maldonado-Burgos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Maldonado-Burgos, 869 F.3d 1, 2017 WL 2888680, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12200 (1st Cir. 2017).

Opinions

ORDER OF COURT

Appellant United States of America filed a petition for rehearing en banc, and, pursuant to First Circuit Internal Operating Procedure X(C), the appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc has also been treated as a petition for rehearing before the original panel. The petition for rehearing has been denied by the panel of judges who decided the case, and the petition for rehearing en banc having been submitted to the active judges of this court and a majority of the judges not having voted that the case be heard en banc, it is ordered that the petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
869 F.3d 1, 2017 WL 2888680, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maldonado-burgos-ca1-2017.