United States v. Malcolm
Opinion
UNITED STATES
v.
MALCOLM.
Supreme Court of United States.
*794 Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, Mr. Sewall Key and Miss Helen R. Carloss, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, and Mr. Erwin N. Griswold submitted for the United States.
Messrs. Kingman Brewster, James S.Y. Ivins, Allen G. Wright, A.J. Hill, O.R. Folsom-Jones, Joseph D. Brady, and F.E. Youngman submitted for Malcolm.
PER CURIAM.
The first question certified is answered: No. The second question is answered: Yes. Poe v. Seaborn, ante, p. 101; Goodell v. Koch, ante, p. 118; Hopkins v. Bacon, ante, p. 122.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
282 U.S. 792 (United States v. Malcolm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.