UNITED STATES v. MAINE Et Al.

Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. MAINE Et Al.

423 U.S. 1, 96 S. Ct. 23, 46 L. Ed. 2d 1, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 89

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 6, 1975

Docket35 ORIG

StatusPublished

Cited by20 cases

This text of 423 U.S. 1 (UNITED STATES v. MAINE Et Al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

UNITED STATES v. MAINE Et Al., 423 U.S. 1, 96 S. Ct. 23, 46 L. Ed. 2d 1, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 89 (1975).

Pincite

Opinion

DECREE

The joint motion for entry of a decree is granted.

For the purpose of giving effect to the decision and opinion of this Court announced in this case on March 17, 1975, 420 U. S. 515, it is Ordered, Adjudged, and Decreed as Follows:

1. As against the defendant States of Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia, the United States is entitled to all the lands, minerals, and other natural resources underlying the Atlantic Ocean more than three geographic miles seaward from the coastlines of those States and extending seaward to the edge of the Continental Shelf. None of the defendant States is entitled to *2 any interest in such lands, minerals, and resources. As used in this decree, the term "coastline” means the line of ordinary low water along that portion of the coast which is in direct contact with the open sea and the line marking the seaward limit of inland waters.

2. As against the United States, each defendant State is entitled to all the lands, minerals, and other natural resources underlying the Atlantic Ocean extending seaward from its coastline for a distance of three geographic miles, and the United States is not entitled, as against any of the defendant States, to any interest in such lands, minerals, or resources, with the exceptions provided by § 5 of the Submerged Lands Act of 1953, 67 Stat. 32, 43 U. S. C. § 1313.

3. Jurisdiction is reserved by this Court to entertain such further proceedings, including proceedings to determine the coastline of any defendant State, to enter such orders, and to issue such writs as may from time to time be deemed necessary or advisable to give proper force and effect to this decree. The United States or any defendant State may invoke the jurisdiction so reserved by filing a motion in this Court for supplemental proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECREE

The joint motion for entry of a decree is granted.

For the purpose of giving effect to the decision and opinion of this Court announced in this case on March 17, 1975, 420 U. S. 515, it is Ordered, Adjudged, and Decreed as Follows:

1. As against the defendant States of Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia, the United States is entitled to all the lands, minerals, and other natural resources underlying the Atlantic Ocean more than three geographic miles seaward from the coastlines of those States and extending seaward to the edge of the Continental Shelf. None of the defendant States is entitled to *2 any interest in such lands, minerals, and resources. As used in this decree, the term "coastline” means the line of ordinary low water along that portion of the coast which is in direct contact with the open sea and the line marking the seaward limit of inland waters.

2. As against the United States, each defendant State is entitled to all the lands, minerals, and other natural resources underlying the Atlantic Ocean extending seaward from its coastline for a distance of three geographic miles, and the United States is not entitled, as against any of the defendant States, to any interest in such lands, minerals, or resources, with the exceptions provided by § 5 of the Submerged Lands Act of 1953, 67 Stat. 32, 43 U. S. C. § 1313.

3. Jurisdiction is reserved by this Court to entertain such further proceedings, including proceedings to determine the coastline of any defendant State, to enter such orders, and to issue such writs as may from time to time be deemed necessary or advisable to give proper force and effect to this decree. The United States or any defendant State may invoke the jurisdiction so reserved by filing a motion in this Court for supplemental proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

423 U.S. 1, 96 S. Ct. 23, 46 L. Ed. 2d 1, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maine-et-al-scotus-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack