Rios v. Parole and Probation

• Court: District Court, D. Nevada
• Decided: January 11, 2021
• Docket: 3:20-cv-00438
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

wT NR Et De fn De EE De YR ete UIA LR dl AN

4 || AARON D, FORD Attorney, General 2 || NATHAN L. HASTINGS (Bar No. 11593) Senior Peputy Attorney General 3 || State of Nevada Office of the Attormey General 4 || 555 Wright Way Carson City, NV 89711 5 re 684-4606 ( shone). 775) 684-4601 (fax) 6 || NHastings @ag.nv,gov Attorney for Defendants Lisa Brannon, Christopher Honholz, and 7 || State of Nevada Ex. Rel. Department of Public Safety, Division of Parole and Probation 8 + Roger S| Doyle, Esq. 9 | 3a No, 10876 erry oyle, Esq, 10 || Nevada Bar No. 10866 44 DOXLE LAW OFFICE, PLLC, 4600 Kietzke Lane, Ste. 1-207 42 || Reno, Nevada 89502 (775) 525-0889 13 (775) 229-4443(fax) admin @rdoylelaw.com 44 Attorneys for Plaintiff 1! 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 17 | MICHAEL JON RIOS ) □ 48 || | Case No, 3:20-cv:438-LRH-CLB 49 || Plaintiff, ) WS, 20 | ) STIPULATION and ORDER FOR STAY OF 24 {| STATE OF NEVADA, EX. REL, DEPT/OF ) DISCOVERY PENDING DECISION PUBLIC SAFETY; DISIVION OF PAROLE) MOTION TO DISMISS 29 || AND PROBATION (DIVISION), et. al., □ 23 Defendants, } 24 as the Division-related Defendants have raised the defense of qualified immunity in their initial 95 respondive pleading!, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff 26 Michadl Jon Rios, by and through counsel Roger S. Doyle and/or Kerry 3. Doyle, and Division-related 27 | |

2B 1 See Behrens v. Pelletier, 516 U.S. 299, 308 (1996); Siegert v, Gilley, 500 U.S. 226, 231 (1991); Harlow y, Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 817-18 (1982) supporting the proposition that discovery should not be allowed and/or} may be stayed until the threshold issue of qualified immunity is resolved, | {

“| NN ret Maret Pram DE ere Ra Peat eet Net eet RA Le BR ane ee NE Oe ee ee ee | □

4 Defendants by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and 2 || Nathan | Hastings, Senior Deputy Attorney General, that discovery in this matter be stayed pending 3 || the Cont’ decision on Division-related Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. 4 ly UM es 5 || Dated mS i» lay of Fannary, 2021, Dated this day of January, 2021 6 □□ f , AARON D. FORD : i ro — Att General 7 |\ Roger 8} Doyle Le omey tenes Attorney for Plaingg} 8 By: “ay 9 | NATHAN L. HASTINGS Senior Deputy Attorney General 40 | Attorneys for Defendants 4q {IPISs ORDERED: 42 ATED: January 11, ,__, 2021. :

43 | * 14 15 pas . ye United States Magistrate Judge 16 17

19 | 20

22 23 24 25 26 27 a) |