United States v. Mah
This text of 439 F. App'x 653 (United States v. Mah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Kenneth Poon Mah appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for manufacturing marijuana and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.
Mah contends that the district court erred in determining that he was ineligible for safety-valve relief under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2, because it applied a clearly improbable burden of proof. We agree. See United States v. Ferryman, 444 F.3d 1183, 1186 (9th Cir.2006) (the burden is on the defendant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he qualifies for safety valve relief).
The case is remanded for the district court to determine whether Mah can prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he qualifies for safety-valve relief. See United States v. Nelson, 222 F.3d 545, 550-51 (9th Cir.2000).
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 F. App'x 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mah-ca9-2011.