United States v. Mackins

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2009·No. 09-6704·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6704

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIE JEROME MACKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (3:97-cr-00022-LHT-4)

Submitted: July 10, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Jerome Mackins, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Willie Mackins appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Mackins, No.

3:97-cr-00022-LHT-4 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mackins, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Mackins (United States v. Mackins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related